Lovli AI vs Candy.ai in 2026, Feed or Catalogue?

The choice between Lovli AI and Candy.ai comes down less to which one is technically better and more to which product shape fits. Lovli is a small curated social feed of 24 companions with profiles, posts, and fan counts, while Candy.ai is a browsable catalogue of 100+ pre-built characters plus user-created ones, all filterable. Every price and token figure in this comparison is the verified August 2026 number exactly as each platform publishes it, with no derived or estimated dollar amounts anywhere. One Lovli profile is a public test fixture named “nora-test” sitting in the site’s sitemap, which says a lot about how thin that “curated” roster actually is. Candy.ai is web-only, so any Candy-branded listing in Google Play or the Apple App Store is a clone, not the official service. The sections ahead cover format, cost transparency, pricing, free tiers, vendor trust, track record, and a final verdict.

Candy.ai’s 100+ Character Catalogue vs Lovli’s 24-Companion Feed

Candy.ai is a catalogue. Users browse and filter through 100+ pre-built characters plus a steady stream of user-created ones, sorting by whatever traits matter to them. There is no editorial voice guiding anyone toward a particular companion.

Lovli takes the opposite approach. Instead of a searchable catalogue, it offers a curated social feed of exactly 24 companions, each presented as a profile with posts and fan counts. Nobody filters by traits or keywords. They scroll a fixed list and take what is there. The curation is the product, and the product is small. How small becomes apparent in the sitemap, which exposes a publicly visible test profile named “nora-test” sitting among the 24. That signals placeholder content rather than two dozen fully fleshed-out companions, and it undercuts the hand-picked framing.

One more structural difference matters. Candy.ai is web-only, operating as a Progressive Web App that users install through the browser’s “Add to Home Screen” option rather than through an app store. That means any Candy-branded listing in Google Play or the Apple App Store is a clone, not the official service. Both platforms are browser-dependent in practice, but only one of them has to worry about impersonators.

Cost Transparency: Candy.ai Token Costs vs Lovli’s Unexplained Credits

Candy.ai publishes its per-action token rates for anyone to read, while Lovli does not. Every paid Candy.ai plan includes unlimited text chat plus 100 tokens per month, and the platform spells out exactly what those tokens cost in practice:

• Text chat costs no tokens.
• An image costs 2-4 tokens.
• A voice message costs 0.2 tokens.
• A live call costs 3 tokens per minute.

Someone who sends a few images and a handful of voice messages a month can work out roughly where the 100-token allowance goes before ever committing to a plan. Top-up packs start at 100 tokens for $9.99, and unused tokens expire at the end of each billing period, so there is no ambiguity about what happens to a leftover balance either.

Lovli publishes half of the same thing. Its six credit packs carry public dollar prices, from $3.99 for 500 credits to $99.99 for 27,000, and its pack page names six categories credits pay for, including voice and calls, videos and live moments, and custom creation. What it never publishes is a per-action rate, so no visitor and no paying subscriber can work out what the 2,000 monthly credits will actually buy.

Candy.ai’s cost logic is written down on public pages where anyone can verify it before signing up: a token has a price and an action has a token cost. Lovli publishes the first half and stops.

Candy.ai Pricing: The Real Monthly Cost You’ll Pay

Candy.ai’s base plan costs $13.99 per month. That is the entry point, and it includes unlimited text chat plus 100 tokens for images, voice messages, and live calls. The billing options break down like this:

• Quarterly billing is $26.97 every three months, which works out to $8.99 per month.
• Annual billing is $47.88, or $3.99 per month.

There is also a Premium Plus tier at $22.38 per month, or $6.38 per month on an annual plan. The only differences from the standard paid plan are 230 tokens instead of 100, early access to new characters, a larger top-up bonus, and five cloned chats instead of two. Everything else about the service stays the same.

The catch sits outside the subscription price. All token top-ups on Candy.ai require a separate purchase, and no paid plan includes enough tokens for heavy image or voice use without buying more. Someone who generates images regularly or makes frequent live calls will burn through 100 tokens fast and then face the top-up shop, where packs start at 100 tokens for $9.99. That is the hidden real monthly cost. It can push a casual $13.99 subscription into the $25-$80 range depending on how much image generation and voice time a user actually wants.

Lovli Pricing: What the Ads Say vs What You’re Actually Billed

Lovli’s monthly plan costs $9.99 and includes 2,000 credits. That is the straightforward starting point, and it is also the number every other plan on the site is built around. The multi-month options are where the advertised pricing gets interesting, because the per-month figures Lovli shows up front are not what anyone ends up paying:

• The 3-month plan is advertised at $6.66 per month but is actually billed $19.99 every 3 months with 7,000 credits, so the $6.66 is never a real charge.
• The 12-month plan is advertised at $4.17 per month but is actually billed $49.99 every 12 months with 30,000 credits, so the $4.17 is never a real charge.

Neither advertised rate ever appears on a statement. The $6.66 and $4.17 figures are purely presentational, derived by dividing the lump sum by the number of months. What actually leaves the card is the full $19.99 or $49.99 in one go, and anyone comparing plans by those per-month headlines is comparing numbers that have no billing reality behind them.

Lovli deserves credit for its struck-through anchor prices. The $29.97 and $119.88 shown as original prices are exactly three times and twelve times its real $9.99 monthly price, which means they are honest arithmetic rather than inflated fake discounts designed to make the sale look better than it is. That is a small act of pricing integrity, and it stands out precisely because it sits alongside a credit system whose actual value nobody can determine.

Free Tiers: What Lovli or Candy.ai Actually Gives You for $0

Both platforms offer something for nothing, and the gap between the two free tiers is wide. The limits break down like this:

• Candy.ai’s free tier grants 5 messages total across all characters, one custom character, and one image. After those run out, payment is required.
• Lovli’s free tier grants 100 welcome credits with no card required.

Candy.ai’s own homepage markets a seven-day free trial. The advertised trial never materializes as a separate offering. What a new user actually gets is the 5-message ceiling, and that is a much thinner deal than the homepage suggests.

Lovli’s free tier has a different problem. Its shop lists a 120-credit item, so the 100 welcome credits cannot buy anything in the store. To reach the cheapest item, a user would need to subscribe or buy the $3.99 starter pack. The credits exist, but they fall 20 short of anything the platform itself prices.

Vendor Trust: Who Runs Each Service and What Happens When You Want a Refund

Candy.ai is operated by EverAI Limited, a Malta company with Malta Business Registry number C107181, so the corporate identity behind the service is a matter of public record. Anyone who wants to know who runs the product can find the answer in a government registry. That accountability extends to refunds: the policy is strict but written down. Users get 24 hours, and the refund is void once more than 20 tokens are used. It is not a generous policy, but it is a defined one, published and enforceable.

Lovli offers none of that. There is no official company behind the platform, and no refund policy exists anywhere on the site. The difference between the two comes down to whether anyone can be found when something goes wrong. Candy.ai gives a name and a jurisdiction to hold accountable. Lovli gives three support email addresses.

Track Record and the One Area Lovli Is Genuinely Better

Lovli’s track record is nearly nonexistent. The domain was registered on 17 July 2026, the site carries a BETA badge, and the supporting evidence is a row of zeros: no Wayback Machine captures, no confirmable Trustpilot profile, no press coverage. None of that is damning on its own, but it does mean there is no history to lean on when deciding whether to hand over a card.

The numbers inside the platform tell an even stranger story. At query time, Lovli’s 24 profiles collectively claimed about 1.5 million fans, a figure that strains belief for a product a month old. The Discord server linked from the site’s own footer had 3 members and 1 online. Those two figures do not reconcile, and the gap between a claimed 1.5 million followers and a handful of Discord users is the kind of inconsistency that matters when a service asks for money.

Candy.ai sits at the other end of the spectrum. It is an established service with a long user base, and its reputation has real substance behind it. Photo generation is widely considered best-in-class, and its Trustpilot scores are described as real and legitimately high rather than gamed or inflated. That is not to say the service is flawless. Its memory resets after roughly 48-72 hours in long conversations, which makes sustained roleplay an exercise in patience. But the platform has years of user history, public reviews, and a verifiable corporate identity behind it, which is more than can be said for a BETA-badged site with a July 2026 registration date.

There is one area where Lovli is genuinely better, and it is worth saying plainly. Every companion on the platform carries an explicit stated age of 20-36, along with a disclosure that the character is AI-generated and that no real person is depicted. That is a level of labeling Candy.ai does not offer, and it is a meaningful step for a service in this category.

The gating matches. An 18+ confirmation appears on arrival, before the feed or any companion profile is reachable, which is one more barrier than Candy.ai puts at its own door. It is a self-declared check rather than a verified one, so a determined minor clicks through it in a second, but the stated ages on the profiles sit behind a stated age check at the entrance rather than behind nothing at all.

Verdict: Candy.ai or Lovli, Which Should You Choose?

The AI companion app verdict here is not close. A buyer who wants a large catalogue and known per-action token costs should choose Candy.ai, and that decision comes with two accepted trade-offs: a 24-hour refund window and a privacy policy that uses chats, prompts, and outputs to train its models. What is on the other side is a service with real history, verifiable ownership, published pricing, and a refund policy that at least exists in writing.

Lovli is a different kind of bet. A buyer should choose it only if they want a small curated 24-companion feed at $9.99 per month and that money is genuinely expendable. No one can say how far its 2,000 monthly credits go, and there is no official company to contact when something goes wrong. Backing a month-old BETA site with $10 a month is a gamble, not an investment.

Those who lean toward Candy.ai should keep its warnings in mind. The service is web-only, so any Candy-branded listing in Google Play or the Apple App Store is a clone, not the official product. Its privacy policy also states that chats, prompts, and outputs train its models and are shared with third-party LLM providers, with no end-to-end encryption. Anyone uncomfortable with that data flow should think twice before subscribing, regardless of how good the character catalogue is.

For the exact numbers side by side, check the comparison table above, then read the full Lovli and Candy.ai reviews on HushVerified to see the verified user review scores that sit behind this verdict.